Her claims—sensational, emotive and difficult to verify—have triggered a nationwide debate, forcing scrutiny of both her identity and the substance of her allegations.
Margaret Anyango Jabalo presents herself as Jaramogi Oginga Odinga’s second wife, asserting that her claim is anchored in family ties: she says she is a sister to Jaramogi’s elder wife, a relationship she argues legitimizes her place within the Odinga household under Luo customary understanding.
She further alleges that certain branches of the family—specifically the Osewe family and a woman she identifies as Betty and her children—were disinherited from the late Jaramogi’s expansive estate, placing blame squarely on Ida Odinga.
However, public records, biographies, and widely accepted genealogies of Jaramogi Oginga Odinga list four wives—Mary Juma, Gaudencia Adeya, Susan Agik and Betty Adongo—with no official mention of Margaret Anyango Jabalo.
No court filings, probate disputes, or public family acknowledgements have surfaced to corroborate her status as a spouse or heir.
Legal experts note that inheritance disputes of such magnitude typically leave a paper trail—one that is conspicuously absent here.
In her recent clips circulating on X (formerly Twitter), Jabalo escalates her accusations, claiming that Raila Amollo Odinga did not die in India, as officially reported, but succumbed to slow poisoning in Karen, Nairobi.
She extends the allegation further, asserting that former President Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta suffers from the same affliction.
These claims directly contradict verified medical and media reports, which state that Raila Odinga died in India after suffering cardiac complications while undergoing treatment.
No credible medical, investigative, or official source has suggested poisoning, nor is there evidence to support claims about Kenyatta’s health.
Notably, Jabalo is not new to political commentary. In March 2025, she released a video message—largely ignored at the time—addressed to Martha Karua, urging her to distance herself from Raila Odinga and instead seek a political partnership with Rigathi Gachagua, whom Jabalo described as “an honest person.”
That clip failed to gain traction then, but its resurfacing now has added fuel to questions about her sanity, motivations and political alignment.
While some of Jabalo’s statements reference real family names and locations—giving her narrative what supporters call an “uncanny ring of truth”—no independent verification supports her core assertions.
Senior ODM figures have publicly distanced themselves from the videos, defending Ida Odinga and dismissing the allegations as reckless and unfounded.
Political analysts warn that such claims, amplified in a polarized digital environment, risk weaponizing misinformation at a time of heightened political tension.
“Specificity does not equal truth,” one analyst noted. “In Kenya, detailed falsehoods often travel faster than verified facts.”
The Odinga family remains one of Kenya’s most scrutinized political dynasties. Viral narratives—especially those invoking family betrayal, poisoned leaders, and hidden heirs—are bound to attract attention.
But investigative review shows that Margaret Anyango Jabalo’s claims remain unproven, unsupported by records, and contradicted by established facts.
Until documentary evidence emerges, her videos stand as allegations, not facts—a reminder of the power and peril of social media in shaping public perception. For now, the story is less about a hidden wife and more about how unchecked claims can challenge truth in the digital age.