While some leaders frame the idea as a step toward stronger governance and inclusion, the reaction from many young Kenyans — particularly Generation Z — has been swift and skeptical.
Kenya’s 2010 Constitution was widely regarded as a landmark achievement, entrenching devolution, checks and balances, and enhanced citizen participation. Yet, fifteen years later, questions persist about implementation rather than structure.
Many critics argue that before the nation embarks on another cycle of constitutional change, leaders should focus on strengthening existing institutions, improving accountability, and delivering meaningful services.
Generation Z, in particular, has shown increasing political awareness and willingness to voice dissent.
Unlike previous generations, young people today are digitally connected, organized, and more outspoken on issues such as unemployment, cost of living, transparency, and equity.
To them, the talk of creating new political offices risks appearing detached from their daily realities.
Supporters of reform, however, contend that establishing clearer roles for opposition leadership and executive coordination could reduce political tension and foster more stable governance.
They argue that structural clarity may, over time, improve policy continuity and national cohesion.
Still, timing remains a critical factor. With the next election cycle approaching, any attempt to revisit the Constitution will inevitably be viewed through a political lens.
Public trust — especially among youth — is fragile, and proposals perceived as power-rearranging rather than people-centered face immediate scrutiny.
The conversation unfolding now reflects a deeper question: What kind of reform truly serves the public interest?
Whether Kenya proceeds with constitutional amendments or pauses to strengthen existing systems, leaders will need to engage openly, communicate clearly, and demonstrate that citizens’ concerns — particularly those of the rapidly growing youth population — are being heard.