The proposed law seeks to regulate medical procedures that help individuals and couples conceive through methods such as in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and surrogacy.
Millie Odhiambo, who has been a strong supporter of the Bill, argued that it provides a legal framework to protect women and families seeking alternative ways to have children.
She emphasized that many couples in Kenya silently suffer from infertility, yet lack proper medical and legal support.
According to her, the Bill is meant to end discrimination and shame associated with childlessness, and to promote modern medical solutions guided by ethical standards.
On the other hand, Peter Kaluma opposed several sections of the Bill, saying they could undermine traditional family values.
He expressed concern that allowing surrogacy and sperm or egg donation without clear moral safeguards might create social and ethical challenges.
His position drew sharp reactions from Odhiambo, who accused him of misrepresenting the intentions of the Bill and using outdated moral arguments to block scientific progress.
The disagreement quickly turned tense as both MPs stood their ground, prompting temporary intervention from the Speaker to restore order.
The clash highlighted the deep divide in Parliament between progressive lawmakers advocating for reproductive rights and conservative members calling for tighter moral controls.
