While critics accuse him of deepening regional divisions, supporters argue that Gachagua has tapped into a long-simmering frustration among voters who feel their leaders have repeatedly failed to translate political loyalty into tangible development.
Prominent lawyer Ahmednasir Abdullahi weighed in on the debate, suggesting that Gachagua’s blunt approach might actually work in his favour.
According to Ahmednasir, many voters in Northern Kenya are increasingly disillusioned with what they see as recycled political elites who bargain for power nationally but deliver little at home.
By calling out these leaders publicly, Gachagua positions himself as an outsider willing to say what others avoid.
Northern Kenya has for decades complained of marginalisation poor infrastructure, insecurity, limited access to water, and slow economic growth remain persistent challenges.
Elections often come with promises, but the lived reality for many residents rarely changes.
In that context, Gachagua’s rhetoric may sound less like an attack and more like an acknowledgment of voters’ pain, even if it ruffles political feathers.
Looking ahead to 2027, politics will likely be less about party labels and more about perceived courage and authenticity.
Voters, especially younger ones, are increasingly drawn to leaders who appear confrontational toward entrenched power structures.
Gachagua’s willingness to challenge regional kingpins could therefore earn him unexpected allies in areas where he was previously viewed with suspicion.
Whether this strategy translates into actual votes remains to be seen. However, one thing is clear by speaking directly and controversially Rigathi Gachagua has forced himself into the Northern Kenya political conversation.
If frustration continues to grow, the same voters now watching skeptically may one day invite him to what Ahmednasir metaphorically called the “high table” of regional politics in 2027.