The remark has spread widely on social media and reflects rising divisions within the National Assembly.
Those behind the idea argue that Nyoro’s values and working style are different from those of some other lawmakers, mentioning MPs Kaluma, Kúrúria, and Sudis by name.
Supporters say separating Nyoro from them would protect him from what they view as negative political habits that could harm his image or performance.
The phrase “Hatutaki aambukizwe ukiritimba,” meaning “we do not want him to be infected by arrogance or complacency,” captures their fear that bad influence could affect his independence and integrity.
Opponents of the idea say it is unrealistic and harmful. They argue that Parliament is meant to be a place for debate, compromise, and teamwork, and that isolating any MP goes against the spirit of democracy.
Political experts note that although Nyoro is popular for his bold leadership style and development projects, calling for a separate chamber raises concerns about unity and fairness in lawmaking.
The debate also brings out deeper issues in Kenyan politics, such as loyalty, ideology, and generational differences among leaders.
Nyoro’s supporters say his reform-minded agenda and focus on results set him apart. Critics respond that true leadership means working with people who have different views, not avoiding them.
Online reactions have been mixed. Some Kenyans praise the idea as a way to protect principled leadership, while others mock it as symbolic and impractical.
Whatever the view, the discussion shows how much attention is now placed on individual politicians, their alliances, and how internal parliamentary dynamics affect national leadership and policy.
The debate continues to shape conversations about leadership, ethics, and whether cooperation or independence matters more in guiding Kenya’s legislative future.