Speaking during a public forum, Kimaiyo alleged that Nyoro is using money he acquired while serving as the Chairperson of the Budget and Appropriations Committee in Parliament to fund development projects.
According to Kimaiyo, Nyoro’s time at the powerful committee gave him significant influence over national budgeting, which he claims later translated into financial muscle for projects on the ground.
He argued that the developments being witnessed should be viewed in the context of Nyoro’s previous parliamentary role rather than personal generosity.
Kimaiyo maintained that leadership positions in Parliament come with access and networks that can shape how resources are mobilized and deployed.
His remarks sparked mixed reactions among residents and political observers.
Supporters of Nyoro dismissed the claims, saying the MP has consistently followed legal and transparent channels in supporting development initiatives.
They argued that holding a senior parliamentary position does not automatically translate into personal wealth or misuse of public funds.
Others viewed Kimaiyo’s statement as part of growing political rivalry, especially as leaders position themselves ahead of future elections.
Nyoro’s allies insist that projects in Kiharu are funded through lawful government allocations, constituency programs, and partnerships.
They point to visible improvements in education, infrastructure, and social services as evidence of effective leadership rather than questionable funding.
Political analysts note that the Budget Committee chairmanship is influential, but decisions are subject to parliamentary oversight and institutional controls.
They caution against making sweeping claims without evidence, saying such narratives can mislead the public.
The debate highlights the broader conversation around accountability, leadership, and the use of public resources in Kenya’s politics.
As discussions continue, residents are urging leaders to focus more on service delivery than political accusations.
For many, tangible development remains the priority, regardless of the political exchanges surrounding its source.