Gachagua, during a visit to Bomet, accused the government of diverting development resources away from the Kalenjin heartland toward other regions like Nyanza, positioning himself as a voice for the community's grievances.
Cheruiyot dismissed these assertions firmly, stating that nobody has appointed Gachagua to serve as the defender or spokesperson for the Kalenjin people.
He pointed out that Gachagua, while in office as Deputy President, had reportedly opposed the appointment of several Kalenjin leaders to key positions, undermining his current claims to champion their interests.
The senator emphasized that the community is aware of the promises made, the ongoing projects, and the timelines for delivery, suggesting that Gachagua's criticisms are misplaced and self-serving.
This exchange highlights deepening divisions within Kenyan politics, particularly in the Rift Valley region where ethnic loyalties and development expectations often intersect.
Cheruiyot's remarks come amid ongoing tensions following Gachagua's impeachment in late 2024, which Cheruiyot played a role in advancing as Senate Majority Leader.
Supporters of the current administration view the response as a necessary pushback against what they see as divisive rhetoric aimed at stirring ethnic sentiments for political gain.
Observers note that such public spats risk escalating ethnic tensions at a time when national unity is needed to address economic challenges.
Gachagua has built a following by highlighting perceived marginalization, but leaders like Cheruiyot argue that authentic representation comes from those actively involved in governance rather than from outside critics.
The debate underscores the complex dynamics of loyalty, accountability, and resource allocation in multi-ethnic Kenya