Amemba Magufuli urged the president to abandon what he termed trivial political attacks and instead confront the economic and social issues weighing heavily on ordinary Kenyans.
According to Magufuli, references to Kalonzo’s hairstyle, whether made directly or indirectly in political rallies, reflect a worrying shift in national discourse.
He argued that such commentary lowers the tone of leadership and fails to address the realities facing citizens, including the rising cost of living, unemployment, and strained public services.
In his view, the presidency demands seriousness, focus, and solutions—not personal jabs aimed at political rivals.
The NRA Party official noted that Kenyans are grappling with escalating food prices, high fuel costs, and increased taxation, challenges that cut across political and regional lines.
He said public frustration is growing as households struggle to balance shrinking incomes against mounting expenses.
Against this backdrop, Magufuli argued, political leaders should be outlining clear strategies to stabilize the economy and protect vulnerable citizens.
Magufuli further accused the president of using ridicule as a political tool to distract from unmet promises.
He claimed that sustained attacks on opposition figures, especially on personal attributes unrelated to policy or leadership, suggest discomfort with accountability.
Rather than engaging in what he described as “political theatrics,” he called on Ruto to openly address questions about job creation, debt management, healthcare, and education.
The statement also defended Kalonzo Musyoka, portraying him as a seasoned statesman who deserves engagement on ideas rather than appearance.
Amemba Magufuli argued that democracy thrives on debate over policy direction, not mockery. He warned that personal attacks risk deepening political polarization at a time when national unity is critical.
While the government has not formally responded to Magufuli’s remarks, the comments reflect a broader unease within sections of the opposition and civil society over the quality of political discourse.